I’m thinking of changing the bit rate for the hi-fi versions of my radio show from 64kbps to 128kbps (mono). It would double the size of the file from about 25 megs to 50 megs. Would this trouble anyone? My iPhone has no trouble with 128kbps on the AT&T network—and of course it’d be a piece of cake on WiFi. I’d still keep the 16kbps lo-fi version for people with slow dialup connections.
Thoughts?
i think you are right..
thank you
By: princess1960 on December 14, 2012
at 12:03 pm
Fine with me. But what’s the bit rate on new issues of the LBO newsletter? It seems to be approaching zero…
By: David on December 14, 2012
at 12:19 pm
Sorry. Yes. Guilty. New one coming out next week. Bit rate should be a lot higher from now on.
By: Doug Henwood on December 14, 2012
at 12:27 pm
I would love a higher bitrate.
By: Eli on December 14, 2012
at 1:12 pm
Can you leave that little sad sack low-fi mp3 available for the wifi bandidos?
They asked.
By: Billy O'Connor (@billyoc) on December 14, 2012
at 1:28 pm
A higher bitrate would be great!
By: Von Allan on December 14, 2012
at 1:55 pm
A higher bit rate would be great!
By: Von Allan on December 14, 2012
at 1:56 pm
Higher bitrate: yes!
By: spartan2600 on December 14, 2012
at 2:39 pm
I say yes.
By: Maria on December 15, 2012
at 10:59 am
Ok with me. Thanks for the heads up.
By: Sal on December 15, 2012
at 11:11 am
Sounds good to me.
By: Mike Hirsch on December 15, 2012
at 1:28 pm
What is the advantage of 128 vs 64? I haven’t noticed any issues related to it (as opposed to those related to, say, interviewees’ cell phones).
By: Jeff Ewener on December 16, 2012
at 6:37 am