Advertisements
Posted by: Doug Henwood | July 20, 2011

PS: The Riksbank is right

I got a couple of emails asking me whether I agreed or disagreed with the passage from the Riksbank’s philosophy of money that I quoted yesterday. I agree. I guess that makes me a tough customer too—a hard-money Marxist, you might say.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. That statement not only affirms the neutrality of money (the money supply can’t change growth in the long run), but it also implies that monetary policy can help make up for demand shortfalls in the short run.

    So if you agree with the Riksbank’s statement, you would support monetary stimulus to return to full employment in the short run. You would only be a hard money type if you disagreed with the statement.

  2. One of the problems of the Riksbank’s approach, as in virtually all discussion on monetary policy analysis is the distribution of liquidity in the economy in termos of:
    * territories (some states/cities are more liquid than others)
    * size of firms (corporations are drowning in cash and small businesses are desperate for it)
    * size of banks (imagine a QE3 but only destined directly for community banks, credit unions and the like)
    * sectors of the economy (some sectors are more import-prone than others)
    Perhaps it’s time for central banks to think about *targeted* expansionary policies that could help fulfill the role of fiscal policy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: